Skip to main content

🛡️ AWS EC2 Security Group allows unrestricted traffic to MongoDB🟢

  • Contextual name: 🛡️ Security Group allows unrestricted traffic to MongoDB🟢
  • ID: /ce/ca/aws/ec2/security-group-allows-unrestricted-traffic-to-mongodb
  • Tags:
  • Policy Type: COMPLIANCE_POLICY
  • Policy Categories: SECURITY

Stats​

not available

Logic​

Similar Policies​

Similar Internal Rules​

RulePoliciesFlags
✉️ dec-x-637372481

Description​

Open File

Description​

Audit and modify AWS EC2 Security Group rules to restrict access to MongoDB instances by blocking unrestricted inbound traffic to ports 27017 - 27020. The access should be limited to specific IP addresses or internal networks to reduce the risk of unauthorized access and potential data breaches.

Rationale​

MongoDB is a NoSQL database, and exposing it to the open internet (e.g., via 0.0.0.0/0) poses a significant security risk. Unrestricted access can lead to data exfiltration, unauthorized changes, and other malicious activities. Restricting access to MongoDB to trusted IP ranges or systems ensures that only authorized users or applications can interact with the database, mitigating the risk of security breaches and reducing the attack surface.

Impact​

Requires careful implementation to ensure legitimate users and systems maintain access.

Audit​

This policy marks an EC2 Security Group as INCOMPLIANT if it contains a rule that meets all the following conditions:

  • The Direction is set to Inbound.

... see more

Remediation​

Open File

Remediation​

From Command Line​

  1. Run the following command to remove or modify the unrestricted rule for MongoDB access:

    aws ec2 revoke-security-group-ingress \
        --region {{region-name}} \
        --group-id {{security-group-id}} \
        --protocol {{protocol}} \
        --port 27017 \
        --cidr {{0.0.0.0/0 or ::/0}}
    • Optionally, run the authorize-security-group-ingress command to create a new rule, specifying a trusted CIDR range instead of 0.0.0.0/0.

  2. Confirm the changes by describing the security group again and ensuring the unrestricted access rule has been removed or appropriately restricted:

    aws ec2 describe-security-groups \
        --region {{region-name}} \
        --group-ids {{security-group-id}} \
        --query 'SecurityGroups[*].IpPermissions[?FromPort==`27017`].{CIDR:IpRanges[*].CidrIp,Port:FromPort}'

  3. Monitor MongoDB access to ensure it's unaffected by the changes.

policy.yaml​

Open File

Linked Framework Sections​

SectionSub SectionsInternal RulesPoliciesFlagsCompliance
💼 APRA CPG 234 → 💼 36d access management controls —only authorised users, software and hardware are able to access information assets (refer to Attachment B for further guidance);4161no data
💼 APRA CPG 234 → 💼 36e hardware and software asset controls —appropriate authorisation to prevent security compromises from unauthorised hardware and software assets;4464no data
💼 APRA CPG 234 → 💼 36f network design — to ensure authorised network traffic flows and to reduce the impact of security compromises;76107no data
💼 APRA CPG 234 → 💼 45 An understanding of plausible worst case scenarios can help regulated entities identify and implement additional controls to prevent or reduce the impact of such scenarios. One example is malware that infects computers and encrypts data, both on the infected computer and any connected storage, including (corporate) networks and cloud storage. Such attacks reinforce the importance of protecting the backup environment in the event that the production environment is compromised. Common techniques to achieve this include network segmentation, highly restricted and segregated access controls and network traffic flow restrictions.83115no data
💼 APRA CPG 234 → 💼 52d appropriate segmentation of data, based on sensitivity and access needs;2634no data
💼 APRA CPG 234 → 💼 53 Wholesale access to sensitive data (e.g. contents of customer databases or intellectual property that can be exploited for personal gain) would be highly restricted to reduce the risk exposure to significant data leakage events. Industry experience of actual data leakage incidents include the unauthorised extraction of debit/credit card details, theft of personally identifiable information, loss of unencrypted backup media and the sale/trade or exploitation of customer identity data.2634no data
💼 Cloudaware Framework → 💼 Network Exposure137no data
💼 FedRAMP High Security Controls → 💼 AC-4(21) Physical or Logical Separation of Information Flows (M)(H)18141no data
💼 FedRAMP Moderate Security Controls → 💼 AC-4(21) Physical or Logical Separation of Information Flows (M)(H)141no data
💼 ISO/IEC 27001:2013 → 💼 A.9.4.1 Information access restriction4992no data
💼 ISO/IEC 27001:2013 → 💼 A.13.1.1 Network controls65no data
💼 NIST CSF v1.1 → 💼 DE.AE-1: A baseline of network operations and expected data flows for users and systems is established and managed1179no data
💼 NIST CSF v1.1 → 💼 DE.CM-1: The network is monitored to detect potential cybersecurity events2165no data
💼 NIST CSF v1.1 → 💼 PR.AC-3: Remote access is managed66no data
💼 NIST CSF v1.1 → 💼 PR.AC-4: Access permissions and authorizations are managed, incorporating the principles of least privilege and separation of duties48127no data
💼 NIST CSF v1.1 → 💼 PR.AC-5: Network integrity is protected (e.g., network segregation, network segmentation)1184no data
💼 NIST CSF v1.1 → 💼 PR.DS-2: Data-in-transit is protected1797no data
💼 NIST CSF v1.1 → 💼 PR.DS-5: Protections against data leaks are implemented89152no data
💼 NIST CSF v1.1 → 💼 PR.PT-4: Communications and control networks are protected1184no data
💼 NIST CSF v2.0 → 💼 DE.CM-01: Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events187no data
💼 NIST CSF v2.0 → 💼 ID.AM-03: Representations of the organization's authorized network communication and internal and external network data flows are maintained128no data
💼 NIST CSF v2.0 → 💼 PR.AA-03: Users, services, and hardware are authenticated102no data
💼 NIST CSF v2.0 → 💼 PR.AA-05: Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties199no data
💼 NIST CSF v2.0 → 💼 PR.AA-06: Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced commensurate with risk84no data
💼 NIST CSF v2.0 → 💼 PR.DS-01: The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected248no data
💼 NIST CSF v2.0 → 💼 PR.DS-02: The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-transit are protected219no data
💼 NIST CSF v2.0 → 💼 PR.DS-10: The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected249no data
💼 NIST CSF v2.0 → 💼 PR.IR-01: Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized logical access and usage165no data
💼 NIST SP 800-53 Revision 4 → 💼 SC-7 BOUNDARY PROTECTION23531no data
💼 NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5 → 💼 AC-4(21) Information Flow Enforcement _ Physical or Logical Separation of Information Flows83141no data
💼 PCI DSS v3.2.1 → 💼 1.1 Establish and implement firewall and router configuration standards71110no data
💼 PCI DSS v3.2.1 → 💼 1.1.6 Documentation of business justification and approval for use of all services, protocols, and ports allowed, including documentation of security features implemented for those protocols considered to be insecure.195no data
💼 PCI DSS v3.2.1 → 💼 1.2.1 Restrict inbound and outbound traffic to that which is necessary for the cardholder data environment, and specifically deny all other traffic.16111no data
💼 PCI DSS v3.2.1 → 💼 1.3 Prohibit direct public access between the Internet and any system component in the cardholder data environment.712113no data
💼 PCI DSS v3.2.1 → 💼 1.3.1 Implement a DMZ to limit inbound traffic to only system components that provide authorized publicly accessible services, protocols, and ports.10100no data
💼 PCI DSS v3.2.1 → 💼 1.3.2 Limit inbound Internet traffic to IP addresses within the DMZ.100no data
💼 PCI DSS v3.2.1 → 💼 1.3.5 Permit only “established” connections into the network.100no data
💼 PCI DSS v4.0.1 → 💼 1.2.1 Configuration standards for NSC rulesets are defined, implemented, maintained.105no data
💼 PCI DSS v4.0.1 → 💼 1.2.5 All services, protocols, and ports allowed are identified, approved, and have a defined business need.95no data
💼 PCI DSS v4.0.1 → 💼 1.2.6 Security features are defined and implemented for all services, protocols, and ports that are in use and considered to be insecure, such that the risk is mitigated.95no data
💼 PCI DSS v4.0.1 → 💼 1.3.1 Inbound traffic to the CDE is restricted.111no data
💼 PCI DSS v4.0.1 → 💼 1.3.2 Outbound traffic from the CDE is restricted.111no data
💼 PCI DSS v4.0.1 → 💼 1.4.1 NSCs are implemented between trusted and untrusted networks.90no data
💼 PCI DSS v4.0.1 → 💼 1.4.2 Inbound traffic from untrusted networks to trusted networks is restricted.100no data
💼 PCI DSS v4.0 → 💼 1.2.1 Configuration standards for NSC rulesets are defined, implemented, maintained.62105no data
💼 PCI DSS v4.0 → 💼 1.2.5 All services, protocols, and ports allowed are identified, approved, and have a defined business need.4795no data
💼 PCI DSS v4.0 → 💼 1.2.6 Security features are defined and implemented for all services, protocols, and ports that are in use and considered to be insecure, such that the risk is mitigated.2195no data
💼 PCI DSS v4.0 → 💼 1.3.1 Inbound traffic to the CDE is restricted.31111no data
💼 PCI DSS v4.0 → 💼 1.3.2 Outbound traffic from the CDE is restricted.111no data
💼 PCI DSS v4.0 → 💼 1.4.1 NSCs are implemented between trusted and untrusted networks.3190no data
💼 PCI DSS v4.0 → 💼 1.4.2 Inbound traffic from untrusted networks to trusted networks is restricted.31100no data
💼 UK Cyber Essentials → 💼 1.2 Prevent access to the administrative interface from the internet85119no data